Thursday, January 27, 2022

ATHEISM & REINCARNATION

You can maybe have no God but still have reincarnation operable in the Universe. In the end you go on in some other way because there is no static equilibrium in our restless Universe. Shakespeare said it well…for there is more in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than is dreamt of in your philosophy…The hardline atheists believe, erroneously, that conciousness ends in static equilibrium, and death is final and inescapable…I believe that all of concious life is reprocessed in some directed and purposeful way to another life, and in the conservation of souls and the law of detailed balancing…I believe in reincarnation where what is good IS God in life…and good struggles with evil at all levels and to infinity…Eddington’s ratios suggest the Universe is special, and likely started off with perfection and grace, and may one day return to that status…it is called Hope and Purpose and hardline atheists are lost these days I am sorry to say. MJB

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

IMMATERIAL-MATERIAL INTERFACE

The immaterial-material conjoint interface is the link between this life and the successive life. The link between this life and the next life coming up. It is what I intend to talk about in my Google blog called ‘Cosmogony’…It is through the I-M interface that the mechanism of reincarnation is possible...and through the operation of the conservation of souls and in keeping with the law of detailed balancing.

SCHLAEFLI'S PHASE RULE

The Gibbs phase rule is P - C + F = 2, where the variables P, C and F are represented by integers. The thermodynamic system in question, in the phase rule, is typically a chemical system comprised of an integer number of phases P, and an integer number of components C, and an integer number of degrees of freedom F. And thus P, C and F are in thermodynamic equilibrium in an isolated chemical system, in which pressure, given by "p", and temperature, given by "T", and volume, given by "V", comprise the 3 "thermodynamic" degrees of freedom within the chemical system. In the Euler formula for the innumerable polyhedra we have V - E + F = 2, where V is an integer number of vertices, and E is an integer number of edges, and F is an integer number of faces. The Gibbs phase rule and the Euler formula for the polyhedra are therefore both of the same general form, and in both formulas the variables are strictly integers. Earlier it has been shown that the Euler formula for the polyhedra (V - E + F = 2) can be transformed, using the identities nF = 2E and pV = 2E, (where "n" is identified as the averaged polygon size over the faces in a given polyhedron, and "p" is identified as the average number of edges meeting at the vertices of a given polyhedron) into an alternative polyhedron formula that was originally proposed by the German mathematician Schlaefli in the 19th century. Schlaefli's formula has earlier been shown to lend itself to a mapping construction, for all the various polyhedra, in which the mapping space is defined by ordered pairs of the form (n, p). Here we suggest an analogous type of mapping scheme, based upon the Gibbs phase rule, that is defined by the analogous variables "a" and "b" as in the following equations: aP = 2C and bF = 2C. One could calculate the variables in the ordered pair (a, b), for all possible chemical systems in thermodynamic equilibrium, and which are thus governed by the Gibbs phase rule, and simply plot them in "a-b" space thus, where "a" is identified as "components-per unit-phases and "b" is identified as "components-per unit-degrees of freedom". This mapping of chemical systems in "a-b" space may likely provide insight into the identities and relationships of any given isolated chemical system to any other isolated chemical system... 

Monday, January 17, 2022

GIBBS & EULER

Gibbs phase rule, a result of classical thermodynamics, is written as (a) P - C + F = 2, where P is the number of phases, and C is the number of components, and F is the number of degrees of freedom. The Euler formula for the polyhedra is thus (b) V - E + F = 2, where V is the number of vertices, and E is the number of edges, and F is the number of faces in a given polyhedron...And if P - C + F = V - E + F = 2, how then are the innumerable polyhedra related to the Gibbsean thermodynamics of phases-components-degrees of freedom of a chemical system…there is likely some analogy or connection, somehow, based upon these simple formulas but no one knows it yet…

Friday, December 31, 2021

FREE MASONRY & CATHOLICISM

Free Masonry, like the Catholic Church, is only as moral as its many members are. There are good and bad human beings and so it is for Masonry and the Church. The Masons believe the Universe was designed and that there is or was a designer. I believe this too and the Eddington ratios suggest this as well…i.e. the structural constants of Nature and the Universe are not of accidental value and are thus designed or finely tuned to be mathematically significant numbers…MJB

LAWRENCE WASHINGTON

Lawrence Washington was the half brother of George Washington and he one time invited George to visit some of the Carribean and meet some of Larry’s family there. George went then to the Carribean some time in his early years and met some of Larry’s family. In any case some of Larry’s blood relations in the Carribean were of African descent and they may have thus been distant relatives of GW. And the Free Masons decided to design the Washington monument as an obelisk because it is of Egyptian origin. I was told all of this in my 20’s before I ever worked for the Federal Government. I have never seen this information and historical facts in any reputable reference work thus…MJB

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

TIMAEUS

The Timaeus is the great work in which the 5 Platonic polyhedra are constructed in its culmination. Plato described a Cosmogony in which the Platonic polyhedra are the 5 ‘elements’ of the Cosmos. Indeed it turns out that imperfect vestiges of these polyhedral archetypes are expressed in the structural forms of the World. Plato was on the right pathway. I think that chemical graph theory is partly the truth in some ways as well. The descriptors I have defined in terms of V and E and F and nF = 2E and pV = 2E, would hold primacy in such an analysis. They emerge from the formula for graphs…V - E + F = 1…I think that someday they will be useful, in various product and ratio descriptor index forms, in chemistry and biological chemistry contexts, through various structure-property analyses.